Product flows before visual polish
We map users, tasks, roles and risks before spending design time on screens that may not support the real workflow.

Product design for real workflows
Figma UX/UI for SaaS, dashboards, portals, design systems and build-ready product screens.
Research, flows, UI, handoff
We turn product ideas, messy screens and workflows into Figma designs that users and developers can understand.
UX/UI Design Services help teams turn unclear ideas, old interfaces, Figma drafts or complex workflows into product screens that are easier to use, approve and build.
Kavita Systems does not treat design as only colors, typography and polished mockups. We first clarify the business goal, user roles, workflow, data, edge cases, responsive behavior and development constraints, so design stays connected to the real product.
We can join at any stage: UX discovery for new products, design systems for scaling teams, cleanup for confusing flows, or modernization for legacy portals, admin panels, SaaS products and company websites.
Figma is used as a working product document. We plan journeys, hierarchy, forms, empty states, validation, errors, permissions, tables, filters, modals, mobile layouts and long-content cases before frontend work makes those choices expensive. When a design system is needed, we organize tokens, components, variants and usage notes so new screens can continue without drift.
The design is prepared for implementation. Laravel, Vue, Nuxt, React, Next, Inertia, Tailwind, PrimeVue, ShadCN, Storybook or custom component constraints are considered in Figma, so developers get spacing, states, responsive decisions and behavior notes they can translate into code.
Kavita Systems treats UX/UI as product work. We clarify users, flows, data, states, responsive rules, component logic and development needs, then connect Figma design, frontend implementation, QA and future product support through visible milestones.
Design Systems &
Component Libraries
Data & Analytics
Dashboards
AI Dashboards &
Copilot Interfaces
SaaS
Platforms
Internal Tools &
Admin Platforms
Startup MVPs &
Product Launches
Productivity &
Collaboration Tools
E-commerce
Platforms
CRM, ERP & Internal
Business Tools
Landing Pages &
Company Websites
AI Automation
Products
Legacy Product
Modernization
We map users, tasks, roles and risks before spending design time on screens that may not support the real workflow.
Screens include states, layout notes, responsive behavior and component intent so developers get more than static mockups.
We create tokens, components and variants only where they reduce future drift and help the product grow after launch.
Tables, filters, empty states, loading, errors and long content are designed before frontend teams must guess behavior.
Vue, React, Nuxt, Next, Inertia and Tailwind constraints are considered before handoff creates avoidable rework.
We review implemented screens, adjust edge cases and help keep the design system useful after the first release.
Discovery, Figma, systems, handoff
UX/UI design is useful when it explains how a product should work, not only how it should look. A SaaS dashboard, portal, booking flow, internal tool, AI product or company website needs screens that match users, data, permissions, content and development reality. We use Figma to make those decisions visible before build work starts.
Discovery starts with the workflow. We review the business goal, users, roles, tasks, entry points, content, data sources, approval steps, integrations, risks and launch pressure. If there is an existing product, we review the current screens, analytics clues, support problems, inconsistent patterns and areas where users or developers get stuck. That gives the design work a practical direction instead of a visual-only brief.
Flows and wireframes come before polish. We map the main user path, screen order, decisions, forms, tables, dashboards, empty states and review steps. This stage helps the team see whether the product logic makes sense before typography, colors and final UI details hide structural problems. It also helps scope the first version, because stakeholders can see what belongs now and what can wait.
Figma becomes a shared product reference. Approved screens should include more than a perfect default state. We plan loading, empty, error, success, disabled, validation, permission, long-content, missing-data and mobile states. For dashboards and admin products, table density, filters, status labels, charts, exports and bulk actions need special care. For websites, hierarchy, conversion paths, content blocks and responsive layout need the same level of attention.
Design systems stay practical. Not every project needs a large design system, but every growing product needs reusable decisions. We organize tokens, buttons, inputs, cards, tabs, modals, tables, navigation, badges, form states and layout patterns when they reduce future work. The goal is not a decorative library. The goal is a Figma structure that helps new screens stay consistent and helps developers build without guessing.
Implementation constraints are part of design. Interfaces built with Vue, Nuxt, React, Next, Inertia, Tailwind, PrimeVue, ShadCN or custom components each have different tradeoffs. Laravel-backed products also need access rules, validation, API states and admin workflows reflected in the UI. We design with those constraints in mind so Figma does not promise interactions, spacing or components that are expensive or unclear to implement.
AI tools can speed exploration, but judgment stays human. Figma Agents can help explore screen alternatives, reorganize old layouts and produce first drafts. Figma MCP can help bring design context closer to coding agents and frontend implementation. Those tools are useful when they are directed by product goals, design rules and engineering review. We do not let automation decide hierarchy, accessibility, data behavior or user trust.
Modernization protects useful product knowledge. A confusing old UI may still contain important workflow decisions. We do not redesign only for novelty. We identify what users rely on, what blocks conversion or productivity, what creates support work and what can be improved in phases. This is especially important for dashboards, admin panels, CRM-like tools, legacy PHP products, booking systems and internal portals where staff already depend on daily routines.
Handoff includes behavior, not only pixels. Developers need to know breakpoints, component names, spacing intent, state rules, validation messages, role differences, empty content, API assumptions and what can be reused. We prepare notes and review screens with implementation in mind. After development starts, we can support UI review, compare built screens against Figma, adjust edge cases and keep product decisions from drifting.
QA starts earlier when design is complete enough. A strong Figma file helps QA because it shows expected states before code exists. Testers and developers can compare flows, forms, table behavior, mobile layouts, errors and permission views against the design. This reduces late ambiguity and gives the client a clearer reference for what was approved, what changed and what should be improved after launch.
The result is a product design system that can keep moving. After launch, UX/UI support may include new screens, conversion improvements, dashboard cleanup, component additions, responsive fixes, accessibility improvements, design system updates or product modernization. Kavita Systems keeps the work practical: design decisions stay connected to users, developers, budget and the next useful release.
Practical tools for real releases. A focused mix of design, app frameworks, data tools, automation, hosting, and quality checks selected around each product.
Clarify users, flows, risks, scope and design priorities now.
UX / Research / Roadmap Plan
Map product flows, screens and states before visual polish.
Figma / Flows / Wireframes
Organize tokens, components, variants and reusable UI rules.
Tokens / Components / UI Kit
Plan desktop, tablet and mobile layouts before development.
Mobile / Tablet / Desktop UI
Review dashboards, tables, filters and data states clearly.
Dashboards / Tables / States
Validate Figma flows before build decisions become costly.
Prototype / Testing / Feedback
Prepare specs, states, spacing and notes for frontend teams.
Figma / Dev Handoff / Specs
Audit old screens and plan safer redesign phases with teams.
Audit / Redesign / UI Cleanup
Some work is public, while many long-term client systems remain private under NDA.

Years active: 2025 - in progress
Stock trading platform for buying and selling shares with real-time market data, portfolio tracking and secure account workflows.
Key points: live quotes, order flow, watchlists, market signals, portfolio analytics, user dashboards, transaction history and security-focused access.
UX/UI design services can include product discovery, user flow mapping, wireframes, Figma prototypes, high-fidelity UI screens, responsive layouts, design system components, dashboard states, form states, developer handoff notes and support during implementation. The exact scope depends on whether the product is new, growing, being supported or being modernized.
UX work helps the team decide what users need to do before code makes the wrong decisions expensive. It reveals missing screens, unclear steps, permission issues, data states, mobile problems and scope questions early. This does not mean every detail must be final before development, but the main workflow should be clear enough for estimation, design approval and implementation planning.
No. We can start from an idea, old website, screenshots, product notes, a current app, rough wireframes or a competitor reference. If there is no Figma file, we can create one. If there is an existing file, we can review it, clean it up, fill missing states and prepare it for development. The starting point matters less than the clarity of the workflow and the decisions the design must answer.
Not always. A small product may only need a practical component set and clear screen rules. A growing SaaS product, dashboard or portal may need tokens, variants, form patterns, table behavior, modals, navigation and documentation. We choose the level of system work around the product stage, budget and future screen needs, not because every project needs a large library.
We prepare screens with states, breakpoints, spacing intent, component names, responsive behavior, form rules, validation examples and notes about data or permissions when needed. The goal is to reduce guessing during frontend implementation. If the team uses Vue, React, Nuxt, Next, Inertia, Tailwind or a component library, we consider those constraints while shaping the Figma file.
Yes. Dashboards and admin panels need different design decisions than marketing pages. We pay attention to data density, filters, statuses, table actions, empty states, loading, errors, permissions, exports, mobile behavior and repeated daily use. These screens should help people compare, decide and act quickly instead of looking decorative but becoming hard to use.
Yes. We can audit the current interface, identify confusing flows, preserve useful product logic and plan redesign in phases. This is often better than a total visual reset, especially when staff or clients already depend on the product. The goal is to improve usability and consistency while reducing implementation risk and protecting working behavior.
We can use AI-assisted tools and Figma Agents for exploration, layout alternatives, content drafts and faster research, but product judgment stays human. AI can speed the first pass, but it should not decide hierarchy, accessibility, data behavior, trust, permissions or implementation fit. We review generated ideas against the product goal and the technical reality.
Figma MCP can help bring design context closer to development tools and coding agents. It can make spacing, layers, components and intent easier to inspect from code workflows. It does not replace a good Figma structure or frontend review. The best result comes when the design file is organized clearly and developers still make responsible implementation decisions.
Yes. We consider contrast, readable hierarchy, touch targets, focus behavior, labels, states, responsive layouts and content that may become longer than expected. Accessibility is easier to support when it is part of the design decisions, not added after visual approval. For complex products, we also consider keyboard use, errors, disabled states and screen density.
After approval, the design can move into frontend implementation, backend planning, QA preparation or further product planning. We can support developers during handoff, review built screens, adjust edge cases, document component behavior and help plan the next product release. Design should remain useful after approval, not disappear once coding starts.
It depends on the number of flows, screen complexity, existing materials and how much system work is needed. A small audit or prototype can move quickly. A SaaS dashboard, portal or design system needs more time because states, responsive behavior and component rules must be planned. We usually start by defining the first useful design scope, then estimate milestones from that.
Hourly Rate
Senior talent by role.
Specialists
Matched to your project.
Tracked Hours
Verified Upwork history.
Min. Budget
Trusted since 2015.